CHANDIGARH: In a noteworthy relief for a NRI lady who sat tight for a long time to get a level in Mohali, the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has guided a private real estate broker to pay more than Rs 14 lakh as punishment (Rs 1,000 every day since August 2014 till June 2017) and Rs 1 lakh as pay and prosecution charges for neglecting to give ownership of the level on time.
The discussion has likewise disclosed to Chandigarh Overseas Private Limited to hand over the ownership of the level to complainant Ravinder Kaur Wadhwa from Sector 70, Mohali.
In her protest, Wadhwa said willing to claim a private property in India, they obtained a level in a venture `Fashion Technology Park' in Sector 90, Mohali being produced by Chandigarh Overseas Private Limited. The aggregate cost of the said unit was settled at Rs 26.40 lakh.
She paid a measure of Rs 25.90 lakh on July 10, 2009 after which a temporary allocation letter was issued to support them and purchaser's designer assention was likewise marked.
Wadhwa said according to condition 14 of that assention, it was concurred that ownership of the unit would be conveyed by January 15, 2011, coming up short which an arrangement was made to repay the complainants by making an installment of Rs 1000 every day for the time of postponement .
Be that as it may, notwithstanding getting over 98% of the deal thought of the said unit, the manufacturer neglected to convey ownership of level by the stipulated date. On rehashed demands made by the complainant, the manufacturer vide email dated November 27, 2012 insinuated that ownership of the unit will be conveyed at the very latest December 31, 2013, however it neglected to do as such even by that date.
In their answer, the manufacturer said the ownership of the unit couldn't be conveyed because of compel majeure conditions. There were cer tain deterrents, which were raised by Punjab Government, as to affirmed plan.They needed to challenge the same and stored an extra sum under dissent, in spite of having lawful standing, which come about into delay in development. Be that as it may, the archives identified with the said issue have been lost because of moving of records, they said.
It was additionally informed that the debate happened between the manufacturer and the contractual worker and the agreement was ended and the same was given to another temporary worker. Be that as it may, a question again emerged and the issue achieved the common court.
Real estate brokers shared that the development at the venture was remained on April 26, 2011, which was cleared just on August 23, 2014. In view of that reason, it couldn't raise any development of units pads to finish the venture. It was additionally expressed that there was likewise a worldwide subsidence, because of which the venture couldn't be finished.
The commission watched that the issue went to the common court which allowed a between time remain on construction.During this period, it was outside the ability to control of the real estate brokers to raise any building. In perspective of above, for the time of stay , the complainants are not qualified for get any remuneration, the commission said.
The commission said that the complainant was in this manner qualified for get a remuneration of Rs 1,000 every day for the period falling between January 15, 2011to April 25, 2011and from there on from August 24, 2014 till such time when ownership is really conveyed to them of the developed unit.
Term of Service – We do not own copyright of this Content on this website. The copyright belongs to the respective owners of the videos uploaded to Youtube . If you find any Content infringe your copyright or trademark, and want it to be removed from this website, or replaced by your original content, please contact us.